# Composal vs Autify

Compare the specific Autify product and application surfaces you will buy. Composal combines browser Scenarios with Discovery and Deep Scan rather than making one generic claim about all test types.

## Composal

Composal sends AI browser agents to use your running web app and check the outcomes you care about. Define journeys as plain-English Scenarios, map existing flows with Discovery, or explore for bugs with Deep Scan. Runs keep recordings and reproduction steps so your team or coding agent can investigate a Finding.

[Verify documentation](https://composal.com/docs/verify)

## Autify

AI testing platform

Autify provides AI-assisted software-testing products that help teams create, run and maintain automated coverage. Its public offering spans testing workflows beyond manually authored scripts.

## What each tool does

| Workflow | Composal | Autify |
| --- | --- | --- |
| [Run browser journeys](https://composal.com/product/scenarios) | ✓ Yes: Run saved browser Scenarios and return recordings and reproducible Findings. | ✓ Yes: Runs automated checks against application behavior. |
| [Map application workflows](https://composal.com/product/discovery) | ✓ Yes: Discovery maps key application areas and user journeys. | – Not confirmed: Check whether this product includes this workflow in your intended plan and setup. |
| [Explore for unexpected issues](https://composal.com/product/deep-scan) | ✓ Yes: Deep Scan explores the running application and reports reproducible issues. | – Not confirmed: Check whether this product includes this workflow in your intended plan and setup. |
| [Describe checks in plain English](https://composal.com/product/scenarios) | ✓ Yes: Author Scenarios around the intended user outcome, then review the steps and expected results. | – Not confirmed: Check whether this product includes this workflow in your intended plan and setup. |
| [Run or inspect from a terminal](https://composal.com/product/cli) | ✓ Yes: Use the CLI to start and inspect verification runs and their Findings. | – Not confirmed: Check whether this product includes this workflow in your intended plan and setup. |

With setup means you supply code or configuration. Not confirmed means support for this workflow needs checking with the vendor.

## Where each fits

Consider Autify when its test-creation and execution model suits your QA process. Consider Composal for a web-focused workflow from journey definition through exploratory findings.

## Try this evaluation

Automate an authenticated flow, change its UI and repeat the run. Track human edits, false alarms and the evidence available when the expected outcome fails.

### Coverage

Which user outcomes must this release prove, and which specialist checks must stay in your existing stack?

### Setup

Who prepares accounts, test data, permissions and access to the deployment being tested?

### Evidence

Can the engineer reproduce a reported failure from the recording and steps, without asking the tester to investigate again?

### Ownership

Who updates the checks when the product changes, and can the team review what a passing result actually proves?

## Related comparisons

- [Composal vs Functionize](https://composal.com/compare/composal-vs-functionize.md)
- [Composal vs Virtuoso QA](https://composal.com/compare/composal-vs-virtuoso.md)
- [Composal vs ACCELQ](https://composal.com/compare/composal-vs-accelq.md)

[All comparisons](https://composal.com/compare.md)