# Composal vs Repeato

Repeato emphasizes visual recording and repeatable UI checks, especially for mobile apps. Composal focuses on web outcomes expressed as Scenarios and browser exploration that yields reproducible Findings.

## Composal

Composal sends AI browser agents to use your running web app and check the outcomes you care about. Define journeys as plain-English Scenarios, map existing flows with Discovery, or explore for bugs with Deep Scan. Runs keep recordings and reproduction steps so your team or coding agent can investigate a Finding.

[Verify documentation](https://composal.com/docs/verify)

## Repeato

Recorded mobile and web UI regression tests

Repeato Studio records and edits Android, iOS and web tests on devices or simulators. Its docs describe UI assertions using image fingerprints, text and numbers, plus reusable test batches and reports.

## What each tool does

| Workflow | Composal | Repeato |
| --- | --- | --- |
| [Run browser journeys](https://composal.com/product/scenarios) | ✓ Yes: Run saved browser Scenarios and return recordings and reproducible Findings. | – With setup: The product supports configured application test automation; confirm the web/mobile surfaces and authoring model for your plan. |
| [Map application workflows](https://composal.com/product/discovery) | ✓ Yes: Discovery maps key application areas and user journeys. | – Not confirmed: Check whether this product includes this workflow in your intended plan and setup. |
| [Explore for unexpected issues](https://composal.com/product/deep-scan) | ✓ Yes: Deep Scan explores the running application and reports reproducible issues. | – Not confirmed: Check whether this product includes this workflow in your intended plan and setup. |
| [Describe checks in plain English](https://composal.com/product/scenarios) | ✓ Yes: Author Scenarios around the intended user outcome, then review the steps and expected results. | – Not confirmed: Check whether this product includes this workflow in your intended plan and setup. |
| [Run or inspect from a terminal](https://composal.com/product/cli) | ✓ Yes: Use the CLI to start and inspect verification runs and their Findings. | – Not confirmed: Check whether this product includes this workflow in your intended plan and setup. |

With setup means you supply code or configuration. Not confirmed means support for this workflow needs checking with the vendor.

## Where each fits

Choose Repeato when mobile UI regression and visual assertions are central to your release. Choose Composal when your team needs hosted web QA across saved journeys and exploratory investigation.

## Try this evaluation

Test a mobile onboarding flow and its web companion. Compare how each assertion handles changing content, which platforms are covered and how easily a web finding can be shared with the developer making the change.

### Coverage

Which user outcomes must this release prove, and which specialist checks must stay in your existing stack?

### Setup

Who prepares accounts, test data, permissions and access to the deployment being tested?

### Evidence

Can the engineer reproduce a reported failure from the recording and steps, without asking the tester to investigate again?

### Ownership

Who updates the checks when the product changes, and can the team review what a passing result actually proves?

## Related comparisons

- [Composal vs TestArchitect](https://composal.com/compare/composal-vs-testarchitect.md)
- [Composal vs Eggplant Functional](https://composal.com/compare/composal-vs-eggplant-functional.md)
- [Composal vs Progress Telerik Test Studio](https://composal.com/compare/composal-vs-telerik-test-studio.md)

[All comparisons](https://composal.com/compare.md)