# Composal vs TestingBot

TestingBot primarily provides execution environments and related test reports.

## Composal

Composal sends AI browser agents to use your running web app and check the outcomes you care about. Define journeys as plain-English Scenarios, map existing flows with Discovery, or explore for bugs with Deep Scan. Runs keep recordings and reproduction steps so your team or coding agent can investigate a Finding.

[Verify documentation](https://composal.com/docs/verify)

## TestingBot

Browser, mobile device, and visual test grids

TestingBot provides cloud browser and real-device testing for common automation frameworks including Selenium, Playwright, Cypress, and Puppeteer. Its public product materials describe parallel execution, manual browser sessions, visual comparisons, and mobile testing. Teams connect their existing tests to a hosted grid rather than provisioning each browser environment themselves.

## What each tool does

| Workflow | Composal | TestingBot |
| --- | --- | --- |
| [Run browser journeys](https://composal.com/product/scenarios) | ✓ Yes: Run saved browser Scenarios and return recordings and reproducible Findings. | – With setup: Provides browser/device sessions or a grid; supply and run your own test or interactive session. |
| [Map application workflows](https://composal.com/product/discovery) | ✓ Yes: Discovery maps key application areas and user journeys. | – Not confirmed: Check whether this product includes this workflow in your intended plan and setup. |
| [Explore for unexpected issues](https://composal.com/product/deep-scan) | ✓ Yes: Deep Scan explores the running application and reports reproducible issues. | – Not confirmed: Check whether this product includes this workflow in your intended plan and setup. |
| [Describe checks in plain English](https://composal.com/product/scenarios) | ✓ Yes: Author Scenarios around the intended user outcome, then review the steps and expected results. | – Not confirmed: Check whether this product includes this workflow in your intended plan and setup. |
| [Run or inspect from a terminal](https://composal.com/product/cli) | ✓ Yes: Use the CLI to start and inspect verification runs and their Findings. | – Not confirmed: Check whether this product includes this workflow in your intended plan and setup. |
| Browser and device infrastructure | × No: Use a dedicated tool for this specialist workflow alongside Composal’s browser verification. | ✓ Yes: TestingBot provides cloud browser and real-device testing for common automation frameworks including Selenium, Playwright, Cypress, and Puppeteer. Its public product materials describe parallel execution, manual browser sessions, visual comparisons, and mobile testing. Teams connect their existing tests to a hosted grid rather than provisioning each browser environment themselves. |

With setup means you supply code or configuration. Not confirmed means support for this workflow needs checking with the vendor.

## Where each fits

Choose TestingBot when your team has scripts to run across browser or mobile combinations and wants a hosted grid with manual sessions.

## Try this evaluation

Pick a staging login and a form validation journey already covered by one framework test.

### Coverage

Which user outcomes must this release prove, and which specialist checks must stay in your existing stack?

### Setup

Who prepares accounts, test data, permissions and access to the deployment being tested?

### Evidence

Can the engineer reproduce a reported failure from the recording and steps, without asking the tester to investigate again?

### Ownership

Who updates the checks when the product changes, and can the team review what a passing result actually proves?

## Related comparisons

- [Composal vs Browserling](https://composal.com/compare/composal-vs-browserling.md)
- [Composal vs Kobiton](https://composal.com/compare/composal-vs-kobiton.md)
- [Composal vs HeadSpin](https://composal.com/compare/composal-vs-headspin.md)

[All comparisons](https://composal.com/compare.md)